Hyper-V Server 2008 R2 vs. Svr 2008 R2 w/Hyper-V Role, in Virtual Server 2005
ASP Developer Network - Brought to you by Steve Radich and BitShop, Inc. - http://www.bitshop.com

Menu

ASPDeveloper.Net / VirtualServerFAQ.COM

Make sure you go to our home page for:

* Virtual Server 2005 FAQ
* ASP.Net 2.0 Information
* ASP.Net 2.0 Streaming Tutorials
* ASP.Net 2.0 HTML based Tutorials

Made possible by Business Internet Technology Shop (BitShop)



View :  Show duplicate posts
Virtual Server 2005

Recent Virtual Server 2005 posts

Prompt for password EVERYTIME!!!
VMMAgent Error 410 When Gathering Information
remote access LAN hyper-V outside office
Hyper-V-Manager and access to W2008 R2 Hyper-V Server?
VMSMP error 28
Hyper-V and Windows Clustering
Some newbie Virutal Server questions
Virtual Server 2005 R2. 32 og 64 bit host?
Approved Services/Softwares to run on Hyper-V
VMM R2
Reset Security Settings to Default
VM Network Adapter Loses Static IP When moved to another Hyper-V S
Hyper-V-VMMS Failed to register service principal name
How many host clustering nodes does Hyper-V Server 2008 R2 support
Fixed vhd Paused Critical
hyper-v and iscsi san
Hyper v win2008 r2
Hyper-V R2 Network Issues
How to start with Hyper-V Server 2008R2?
2008 R2 Hyper-V Dual NIC issues
Add Solution

Latest Topics

Table Of Contents


Post Reply |  This is Spam! | Mark as Spam

Hyper-V Server 2008 R2 vs. Svr 2008 R2 w/Hyper-V Role

Source: microsoft.public.virtualserver
Sent: 10/31/2009
From: Rick S.
Message:

For us, the biggest advantages for Hyper-V Server 2008 R2 are that it's free,
has a lower processor and memory overhead, and has lower storage requirements
for the host OS. The biggest disadvantage is the lack of a tool to manage VMs
(without resorting to WMI scripting).

Full Server 2008 R2 has greater processor and memory overhead and will
require more storage for the OS, but can be used to run the Hyper-V
Management tools. Cost is not an issue because the license for Server 2008
allows for a host + 1 VM install as long as the host is only used for
managing VMs (i.e. no DHCP, DNS, etc.).

What difference in performance can be expected with a full Server 2008 R2
host, used to host only the Hyper-V role and management tools, compared to
Hyper-V Server?

Thanks

Rick



Post Reply |  This is Spam! | Mark as Spam

Related Messages


Post Reply |  This is Spam! | Mark as Spam


Table Of Contents



Other groups

 
Virtual PC (Mac)(3592) Virtual PC(12844) Virtual PC (French)(496)
Virtual Server 2005(6245)
Search
in:
Our Sponsors
Virtual Server 2005 Info Here!
http://www.aspdeveloper.net
Virtual Server 2005 Info Here!
http://www.aspdeveloper.net
Virtual Server 2005 Info Here!
http://www.aspdeveloper.net
Virtual Server 2005 Info Here!
http://www.aspdeveloper.net
Virtual Server 2005 Info Here!
http://www.aspdeveloper.net
rss Wiki rss Blogs rss Articles rss Image galleries rss File galleries rss Forums rss Maps rss Directories
ASP Developer Network (since 1996) - Brought to you by Steve Radich and BitShop, Inc. - http://www.bitshop.com
Copyright © 1997-2005 by BitShop, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
No content may be reproduced in any form without written permission from BitShop, Inc.
We will be honored to assist with reproduction rights on our material if you contact us.
We also can provide print articles for your magazine, private training seminars at your site, and conference presentations.

Thank you for visiting. Please bookmark our site if you found it useful!
If you wish to make a donation it will help further the development of these free resources: